Bajaj Pulsar Ns200 vs Suzuki Gixxer 250
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Bajaj Pulsar Ns200 vs Suzuki Gixxer 250. Bajaj Pulsar Ns200: 24.5 hp @ 9,750 rpm hp, 156 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed 136 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10. Suzuki Gixxer 250: Approximately 26 hp @ 9,000 rpm (estimated based on available data) hp, Approximately 166–169 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed Approximately 145–155 km/h (estimated, varies by conditions), Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Bajaj Pulsar Ns200
Suzuki Gixxer 250
Horsepower (hp)
24.5 hp
26 hp
Torque (Nm)
18.74 Nm
22 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
136 km/h
145 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
156 kg
166 kg
Type
Naked
Naked
Horsepower
24.5 hp @ 9,750 rpm
Approximately 26 hp @ 9,000 rpm (estimated based on available data)
Torque
18.74 Nm @ 8,000 rpm
Approximately 22 Nm @ 7,500 rpm (estimated based on available data)
Top Speed
136 km/h
Approximately 145–155 km/h (estimated, varies by conditions)
Weight
156 kg (curb weight)
Approximately 166–169 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
3.5 L/100km (approx. 28-30 km/L typical real-world average)
Approximately 3.2–3.8 L/100km (26–31 km/L, real-world estimate)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Bajaj Pulsar Ns200
7.5/10
"A smart used buy if the service history is genuinely clean."
Pros
+Punchy motor, strong midrange
+Slipper clutch standard later models
+Solid perimeter frame chassis
Cons
−Oil neglect kills engines fast
−Exhaust header cracks easily
−Fork seals weep high mileage
Suzuki Gixxer 250
7.5/10
"A sharp, unpretentious used buy that rewards careful inspection."
Pros
+Punchy single-cylinder engine
+Excellent fuel economy
+Confidence-inspiring neutral handling
Cons
−Seat foam degrades quickly
−Fairing panels feel flimsy
−Vibes above 7,000rpm
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
