Suzuki Intruder C800 vs Honda Shadow Aero 750
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Suzuki Intruder C800 vs Honda Shadow Aero 750. Suzuki Intruder C800: 50 hp @ 6,500 rpm hp, 228 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Honda Shadow Aero 750: 45 hp @ 5,500 rpm (estimated; Honda did not officially publish power figures for this model) hp, 228 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h (estimated; note: real-world cruising comfort peaks around 130-140 km/h), Motoryk rating 7.8/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Suzuki Intruder C800
Honda Shadow Aero 750
Horsepower (hp)
50 hp
45 hp
Torque (Nm)
65 Nm
61 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
175 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
228 kg
228 kg
Type
Cruiser
Cruiser
Horsepower
50 hp @ 6,500 rpm
45 hp @ 5,500 rpm (estimated; Honda did not officially publish power figures for this model)
Torque
65 Nm @ 3,500 rpm
61 Nm @ 3,000 rpm
Top Speed
175 km/h
175 km/h (estimated; note: real-world cruising comfort peaks around 130-140 km/h)
Weight
228 kg (wet/curb weight)
228 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
5.5 L/100km or approximately 18 km/L (typical real-world average)
4.5 L/100km or approximately 22 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Suzuki Intruder C800
7.0/10
"Reliable, affordable cruiser that rewards sensible buyers who inspect carefully."
Pros
+Shaft drive, zero chain fuss
+Bulletproof bottom-end torque
+Cheap parts availability
Cons
−Carbs demand regular attention
−Stock seat destroys long rides
−Weak highway passing power
Honda Shadow Aero 750
7.8/10
"The sensible cruiser choice that rarely breaks your heart or wallet."
Pros
+Legendary Honda reliability
+Smooth, tractable V-twin
+Comfortable upright ergonomics
Cons
−Carb sensitive to ethanol fuel
−Chrome ages poorly
−Rear shock deteriorates fast
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
