Swm Silverback 400 vs Husqvarna Svartpilen 125
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Swm Silverback 400 vs Husqvarna Svartpilen 125. Swm Silverback 400: approximately 35 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated) hp, approximately 165 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed approximately 145 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Husqvarna Svartpilen 125: 15 hp @ 9,250 rpm hp, 148 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 110 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Swm Silverback 400
Husqvarna Svartpilen 125
Horsepower (hp)
35 hp
15 hp
Torque (Nm)
35 Nm
12 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
145 km/h
110 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
165 kg
148 kg
Type
Scrambler
Scrambler
Horsepower
approximately 35 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated)
15 hp @ 9,250 rpm
Torque
approximately 35 Nm @ 6,000 rpm (estimated)
12 Nm @ 8,000 rpm
Top Speed
approximately 145 km/h (estimated)
110 km/h
Weight
approximately 165 kg (wet/curb weight)
148 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
3.5 L/100km or approximately 28.5 km/L (typical real-world average)
2.8 L/100km (approximately 35.7 km/L)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Swm Silverback 400
6.5/10
"Capable niche adventurer ruined by catastrophic parts and dealer support."
Pros
+Proven Rotax-derived engine
+Capable off-road geometry
+Priced well below competitors
Cons
−Near-zero parts availability
−Negligible dealer support network
−Resale value stays low
Husqvarna Svartpilen 125
7.5/10
"The most stylish A1-licence bike you can buy used."
Pros
+Stunning, distinctive visual design
+Quality WP suspension fitted
+KTM-derived reliable mechanicals
Cons
−Parts and servicing expensive
−Tight service intervals needed
−Soft suspension for heavier riders
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
